Beginnjahr 2016 | Abschlussjahr 2017 |
Institutionendurchführende InstitutionenPersonenProjektleiterInnen+Ansprechpersonen |
Ländercode Österreich | Sprachcode Deutsch | |
Schlagwörter Deutsch | Forschendes Lernen | |
Schlagwörter Englisch | Inquiry Learning | |
Abstrakt |
The practical implementation of the Theory of Inquiry Learning Arrangements (Reitinger, Haberfellner, Brewster, & Kramer 2016) requires autonomy-oriented and structured concepts which offer orientation for all participants in an inquiry learning arrangement. A paradigmatic prototype of this guiding concept is AuRELIA (Authentic Reflective Exploratory Learning and Interaction Arrangement; Reitinger, 2013, pp. 84–115; 2013b, pp. 18–27). AuRELIA takes into account various criteria of inquiry learning. Moreover, it refers to specific steps of reflective thinking and acting (emotional reaction; location and definition; suggestion of possible solutions; development by reasoning and experimenting; rejection or acceptance; application) according to Dewey´s Theory of Inquiry (1933; cf. Reich, 2008, p. 189), as well as the scientific-knowledge building process (thematic access; identifying hypotheses by consulting foreknowledge; designing an investigation; performance; evaluation; review; estimation of results) according to Demuth, Gräsel, Parchmann, and Ralle (2008; see Table 2). In the course of this study AuRELIA is applied and investigated in Teacher Education. Using the CILI (Criteria of Inquiry Learning Arrangment) the realized AuRELIA-Arrangement is tested regarding the evolvement of the Inquiry Learning Criteria a) discovery interest, b) method affirmation, c) critical discourse, and d) conclusion-based transfer. The results are going to be published internationally (in English and Lithuanian). | |
Publikationen (+ link zum OBV) |
|
|
Hauptkategorie(n) | Bildungstheorie (Themenfeld) Lehren und Lernen (Prozesse und Methoden) | |
Mit den Themen des Projekts weitersuchen |